Ohio is front and center in the trade conflict sparked by the Trump administration’s initiation of tariffs in 2018 to protect the U.S. steel and aluminum industries. Ohio is also a state with much at risk if national security trade protection is extended to the motor vehicle assembly and parts industries. Under the regime of retaliatory tariffs in place at the end of 2018:
  • Ohio had the largest exposure of any state to retaliatory tariffs imposed by Canada;
  • China is the largest international destination for Ohio’s soybeans;
  • Ohio is the nation’s second-largest production location of motor vehicles and parts, before GM shuts-down it’s Lordstown assembly plant;
  • Ohio is the nation’s largest production location of motor vehicle engines;
  • Ohio is the location of a major Chinese industrial investment;
  • Ohio is a major supplier state to both Boeing and Airbus’s U.S. assembly operations;
  • Ohio is a production center for appliances; and
  • Ohio’s iron and steel mills produce the third highest value of output among the states.

There are two objectives for this public policy briefing. The first is to document and clarify the moves and counter-moves in 2018’s international trade fight. The second is to discuss the economic impacts of the trade skirmish on the nation in general and Ohio in particular.

This policy brief proceeds in seven steps:
  • The legal weapons the U.S. has deployed in the trade actions of 2018 are described in the first section.
  • The second is a presentation of the trade actions: Who did what to whom and when.
  • The third is a review of available economic estimates of the impact of the trade actions and possible additional measures. Evidence is presented on the impact of the 2002-2003 Bush steel tariffs, as are the results from four econometric models on the expected impact of the current ratcheting up of duties across the globe.
  • The fourth portion of the brief examines the performance of the aluminum and steel, or metal-making, industries to determine whether the imposition of protective duties, or the anticipation of their imposition, had an economic impact. We present the metal-making industry data in sync with the way markets change—first looking for price movements that deviate from trend, then for changes in production levels, followed by increases in employment, culminating in potential investment in new or expanded plant and equipment.
  • The fifth section is a review of the near-recession of 2015-2016 and its impact on the metals-making sector of the U.S. economy.
  • Sixth, we look specifically at Ohio.
  • The final section of the paper is our summing up.

The findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this report are the product of research conducted by the authors and do not represent the views of the John Glenn College of Public Affairs, The Ohio State University, the Ohio Manufacturing Institute, or the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Edward (Ned) Hill is Professor of Economic Development at the John Glenn College of Public Affairs and in the City and Regional Planning program of The Ohio State University and a member of the Ohio Manufacturing Institute. Hill is an author of Coping with Adversity: Regional Economic Resilience and Public Policy (Cornell University Press, 2017).

Contact information: hill.1973@osu.edu
Fran Stewart is Senior Research Associate at The Ohio State University’s John Glenn College of Public Affairs and the Ohio Manufacturing Institute. Stewart is the author of The STEM Dilemma: Skills that Matter to Regions (W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, 2017).

Contact information: franstewart@ameritech.net

Ned Hill discussed his report on the economic impact of the 2018 trade disputes on Ohio and the rest of the nation on C-SPAN's Washington Journal.

© John Glenn College of Public Affairs
Page Hall, 1810 College Road, Columbus, Ohio 43210

Keep up on all the Glenn College news and events by following us on Facebook, Flickr, Instagram, LinkedIn, Twitter and YouTube.