Skip to Main Content
Back to Directory

Amanda Girth

Director of Washington Programs; Associate Professor

Amanda M. Girth is an associate professor and faculty director of Washington Programs at the John Glenn College of Public Affairs at The Ohio State University. She is a nationally recognized expert in acquisition policy and practice. Her research examines how governments design and manage contracts to strengthen accountability and implement performance incentives, as well as the dynamics that foster innovation in complex acquisition systems.

Her scholarship appears in leading outlets such as the Journal of Public Administration Research and TheoryPublic Administration ReviewJournal of Supply Chain Management, and Implementation Science. She has been recognized with a best paper award from the Journal of Supply Chain Management and the American Political Science Association’s Leonard D. White Award for best dissertation in public administration. She is a principal investigator on a series of U.S. Department of Defense–funded projects through the Acquisition Innovation Research Center that diagnose systemic barriers to innovation and design tailored interventions for the acquisition workforce. Her work on market structure and mid‑sized suppliers has informed federal oversight and policy debates, including invited testimony before the U.S. Congress, and is cited by the U.S. Government Accountability Office.

Girth also studies the use of contracts and formal partnership agreements to align health, child welfare, and social service systems. She was a co‑investigator on externally funded research supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation that examined cross‑system collaborations to address the opioid crisis and improve outcomes for children and families.

As faculty director of Washington Programs, Girth leads the Glenn College’s Washington, D.C. office and manages its portfolio of academic and experiential learning programs. She builds and sustains partnerships throughout the federal ecosystem, creates transformative experiences for students, engages alumni, and works to deepen Buckeye presence in the nation’s capital.

Prior to her academic appointments, she was a manager at a global consulting firm where she led information technology transformation initiatives for federal agencies. Her public service career began as an intern in Michigan state government and evolved into her first full-time role. She went on to serve in the executive and legislative branches, advancing policy initiatives related to disability, civil rights, and women’s issues. She brings this practitioner experience into her research and leadership, focusing on real-world challenges facing public managers and developing practical, evidence-based solutions.

Girth received her doctorate in public administration from the School of Public Affairs at American University. She holds a Master of Business Administration from The George Washington University, and a Bachelor of Science in public administration and policy from Oakland University.

She is an adjunct fellow in the Center for the Industrial Base at the Center for Strategic and International Studies and a member of the Research Council for the Systems Engineering Research Center/Acquisition Innovation Research Center. She previously served as editor‑in‑chief of the Journal of Strategic Contracting and Negotiation and is actively involved in several professional associations in editorial, governance, and support roles.

Collaboration Strategies Affecting Implementation of a Cross-Systems Intervention for Child Welfare and Substance Use Treatment: A Mixed Methods Analysis
Implementation Science Communications
November 11, 2024

Amanda Girth, Rebecca Smith and colleagues analyze the implementation of Sobriety Treatment and Recovery Teams (START), finding that collaboration strategies like leadership support, staff co-location, and third-party resource support influence program fidelity depending on local context.

Collaboration strategies affecting implementation of a cross-systems intervention for child welfare and substance use treatment: a mixed methods analysis
Implementation Science Communications
November 11, 2024

Amanda M. Girth, along with her colleagues, identifies collaboration strategies and contextual conditions that influenced the implementation fidelity of the Ohio Sobriety Treatment and Recovery Teams (START) cross-systems intervention integrating child welfare and behavioral health services.

Systemic Factors Influencing Risk Aversion: Diagnosing Behaviors and Tailoring Interventions for Lasting Transformation
July 01, 2024

This report discusses the Phase II work for the Systemic Factors Influencing Risk Aversion: Diagnosing Behaviors and Tailoring Interventions for Lasting Transformation project (WRT-1081.8.4). The project was a collaboration between the Air Force Installation Contracting Center (AFICC) and The Ohio State University (OSU).

Specifying Cross-system Collaboration Strategies for Implementation: A Multi-site Qualitative Study with Child Welfare and Behavioral Health Organizations
Implementation Science
February 12, 2024

Amanda Girth and colleagues identify, describe, and specify multi-level collaboration strategies used during the implementation of Ohio Sobriety Treatment and Reducing Trauma (Ohio START), a cross-system intervention that integrates services across two systems (child welfare and evidence-based behavioral health services) for families that are affected by co-occurring child maltreatment and parental substance use disorders.

Specifying cross-system collaboration strategies for implementation: a multi-site qualitative study with child welfare and behavioral health organizations
Implementation Science
February 12, 2024

Amanda Girth and colleagues examine the implementation of Ohio Sobriety Treatment and Reducing Trauma (START), identifying seven cross-system collaboration strategies that strengthen staffing, service access, and case planning for families facing child maltreatment and parental substance use disorders.

Governance Rules for Managing Smart City Information
Urban Governance
May 31, 2022

This study by Amanda Girth, David Landsbergen and Doctoral Student Mariángeles Westover-Muñoz provides a new framework to identify how cities can select the appropriate governance rules to facilitate the political, financial, and operational sustainability of their IDEs, and derivatively, their smart city efforts.

Contract Design, Complexity, and Incentives: Evidence From U.S. Federal Agencies
The American Review of Public Administration
July 28, 2018

This study analyzes nearly 390,000 federal contracts across service acquisitions of varying complexity to determine whether incentive contracts differ in contract duration, cost, or technical performance when compared with other types of contracts.

Designing the Buyer–Supplier Contract for Risk Management: Assessing Complexity and Mission Criticality
January 19, 2017

This study, published in the Journal of Supply Chain Management, argues that contract design is a predominant strategy to set contractual expectations among supply chain partners to manage risk

Incentives in Third-Party Governance: Management Practices and Accountability Implications
September 13, 2016

This study, published in Public Administration Review, assesses public managers’ use of contract incentives in practice and advances theory development. 

A Closer Look at Contract Accountability: Exploring the Determinants of Sanctions for Unsatisfactory Contract Performance
Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory
April 01, 2014

This research addresses the accountability dynamics in local government contracting by analyzing the decisions public managers make to determine whether they sanction contractors for unsatisfactory performance.

Contact

Office

444 North Capitol Street NW, Washington, DC 20001