Policymakers increasingly turn to third parties to deliver public services through outsourcing, contracting, public-private partnerships and other market-based techniques. For scholars of public administration, the imperative is to better understand the accountability dynamics in third-party governance structures, especially those related to the contract implementation process. Dr. Amanda Girth researches implementation issues and accountability challenges in third-party governance. She studies the strategies that front-line public managers utilize to manage their contracts, contract markets and various constituencies. She examines how public managers design and implement performance incentives to motivate contractor behavior. She also analyzes inclusion policies that target underrepresented groups in order to understand the impact of such acquisition policies on purchasing agencies and suppliers.
Girth received her doctorate in public administration from the School of Public Affairs at American University. She has a Master of Business Administration degree from The George Washington University, where she specialized in management decision-making. She also has a Bachelor of Science degree in public administration and policy from Oakland University.
For over a decade, she worked, taught and studied in Washington, D.C. Prior to her academic appointments, she was a manager in a global management consulting firm overseeing information technology transformation initiatives for clients such as the U.S. Department of State and U.S. Agency for International Development. She is an expert in project management and she has been a certified Project Management Professional since 2004. Her career began with an internship in Michigan state government that later turned into her first full-time job. She worked in both the executive and legislative branches and, among other activities, advanced policy initiatives associated with disability, civil rights and women’s issues.
Her research on government contracting and accountability challenges in third-party governance is published in the Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, the Journal of Supply Chain Management, Public Administration Review, International Public Management Journal, and Administration & Society, among other outlets. Her research on federal contracting has been funded by the U.S. Department of the Navy and the National Center for the Middle Market. She was awarded the 2011 Leonard D. White Award for the best dissertation in public administration from the American Political Science Association.
She was recently appointed as an adjunct fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (2021-2023). She is involved with a number of professional associations, and serves on the editorial board for Perspectives on Public Management & Governance.
This study by Amanda Girth, David Landsbergen and Doctoral Student Mariángeles Westover-Muñoz provides a new framework to identify how cities can select the appropriate governance rules to facilitate the political, financial, and operational sustainability of their IDEs, and derivatively, their smart city efforts.
This study, published by Public Performance and Management Review, finds that contract managers who have had more rules training tend to believe that they have less autonomy and view the behaviors of others as unethical.
This study, published in Administration & Society, utilizes the Strategic Action Field (SAF) framework as a lens to study implementation effectiveness of Ohio START, a multiactor and multilevel implementation process
This study, published in the Journal of Supply Chain Management, argues that contract design is a predominant strategy to set contractual expectations among supply chain partners to manage risk
This study, published in Public Administration Review, assesses public managers’ use of contract incentives in practice and advances theory development.
This study, published by Administration and Policy in Mental Health, examines worker perceptions of how public child welfare agencies' purchase of service contracts with private behavioral health organizations can both facilitate and constrain referral making and children's access to services.
This study, published by Public Administration Review, examines how structural differences in governance arrangements affect citizens’ notions of who is culpable for poor service quality.