Skip to Main Content

Help for Homeowners in Crisis: Improving Assistance Programs

More than one in 10 homeowners received mortgage payment forbearance, or a temporary pause in mortgage payments, following a COVID-related financial hardship. (Story image used under license from Nicholas J. Klein, stock.adobe.com)
News Type College News
More than one in 10 homeowners received mortgage payment forbearance, or a temporary pause in mortgage payments, following a COVID-related financial hardship. (Story image used under license from Nicholas J. Klein, stock.adobe.com)

About Stephanie Moulton

Learn more about Acting Dean Stephanie Moulton and her expertise in housing and consumer finance, policy implementation and management across sectors, and program evaluation. 

A new study by researchers at the John Glenn College of Public Affairs offers insights into policies that could stabilize homeowners’ financial vulnerability at times of crisis.  

Acting Dean Stephanie Moulton and doctoral candidate Brandon Frye led the study, which examined borrower outcomes following pandemic-era relief programs and was released by the Mortgage Bankers Association’s Research Institute for Housing America. 

The research provides potential solutions as homeownership costs increase nationwide. For example, in a recent survey from Pew Research Center, most U.S. homeowners (71%) said the cost of their homeowners insurance has gone up over the last few years. LendingTree research this spring found that, from 2020 through 2025, regulator-approved home insurance rates rose 45.8% nationally, compared with a 26.1% inflation rate. 

Affected by rising unemployment rates at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, many homeowners avoided foreclosure through public- and private-sector actions that provided immediate mortgage relief. More than one in 10 homeowners received mortgage payment forbearance, or a temporary pause in mortgage payments, following a COVID-related financial hardship. 

By the end of 2021, more than 80 percent of borrowers who entered forbearance had exited and resumed payments or paid off their loans. However, some homeowners continued to face financial challenges and turned to the Homeowner Assistance Fund (HAF), authorized by the federal American Rescue Plan Act, for assistance with mortgage payments as well as non-mortgage expenses such as property taxes, homeowners association fees, insurance and utility payments.  

The fund, which distributed nearly $10 billion nationwide through state housing finance agencies, U.S. territories and tribal governments, is scheduled to end in September; most states have depleted their funding amount.  

“There has been a lot of attention to COVID-era mortgage forbearance policies that are now a permanent part of the loss mitigation waterfall for homeowners with federally backed mortgages,” said Moulton. “This is the first study to examine the $10 billion Homeowner Assistance Fund program and the homeowners who benefited.” 

The insights from this report help us think about potential gaps in the loss mitigation waterfall and the types of homeowners who may benefit from targeted support when they experience a crisis.

Acting Dean Stephanie Moulton
John Glenn College of Public Affairs

The report analyzes the distribution and use of HAF assistance nationwide, differences in state implementation and the characteristics of borrowers who received support — highlighting those who required help beyond traditional forbearance and loss mitigation options. Using data from the Ohio Housing Finance Agency, the researchers compared the characteristics of Ohio homeowners who received mortgage payment forbearance during the COVID-19 pandemic and Ohio homeowners who received assistance through HAF, in addition to or instead of forbearance.  

The research uncovered three potential gaps in loss mitigation waterfall that could be addressed through policy changes: 

  • Enhancements can target homeowners who hold private loans or loans that are not covered by the loss-mitigation waterfall options included in government-sponsored or Federal Housing Administration mortgages.  
  • Enhancements can cover expenses other than mortgage expenses that make homeownership unaffordable, like property taxes and homeowner’s insurance, or even unexpected home repairs, that most HAF programs covered. As property insurance costs continue to increase nationwide, it is important to think about strategies that can assist homeowners with unexpected increases — including homeowners who own their homes without a mortgage. 
  • In some cases it may make sense to combine HAF-like subsidies with mortgage forbearance and the standard loss mitigation options to increase homeownership affordability — particularly for homeowners experiencing more lasting income shocks. 

Digging Into the Data

Learn more about the Ohio Longitudinal Data Archive, a powerful resource comprised of public administrative records for millions of Ohio residents that offers researchers a unique opportunity to analyze the education, work and training experiences of Ohioans over time.

In addition to Moulton and Frye, the research team included Madeleine Drost, a Glenn College research manager, and partnered with the Urban Institute and Ohio Housing Finance Agency. The researchers used data from the Ohio Longitudinal Data Archive, an administrative data partnership that centralizes state administrative data into a single repository to support the policy research priorities of Ohio’s public agencies and the Ohio Education Research Center at the Glenn College. The data archive is managed by CHRR at The Ohio State University in collaboration with state workforce and education agencies, which provide oversight and funding. 

“Pandemic-era housing policy interventions proved highly effective in stabilizing the mortgage market and helping the vast majority of homeowners avoid foreclosure during an unprecedented economic shock,” said Edward Seiler, executive director, Research Institute for Housing America, and Mortgage Bankers Association associate vice president, housing economics.  

“The research highlights not only the success of broad-based relief efforts like forbearance but also the critical role of targeted programs such as the Homeowner Assistance Fund in supporting more vulnerable borrowers,” Seiler said. “As we look ahead, these findings offer important lessons for how policymakers and industry stakeholders can respond to future economic disruptions while promoting sustainable homeownership.” 

Read the report, “Stabilizing Vulnerable Homeowners in a Time of Crisis: Insights from the Homeowner Assistance Fund,” and the associated news release on the Mortgage Bankers Association website.