Glenn College Faculty Research Seed Grant Program Policy
Preference will be given to proposals that contribute to the faculty member’s knowledge creation portfolio and the College’s research goals. Demonstrated past success in generating research identified as a “primary output” in the College’s Appointment, Promotion and Tenure document will increase the chances of approval. Strong proposals will be based on a track record of past knowledge creation success and lay out a viable strategy for future knowledge creation that results in “primary outputs.”
The College aspires to offer faculty members the opportunity to further develop their research through this seed grant opportunity, but in any given year there is no requirement that the College approve any proposal. Examples of decision criteria include:
- Priority given to faculty with little to no funded research portfolio
- Priority given to new faculty
- Proposals can either fully fund the work proposed or serve as cost share for an externally funded research application
- Priority given to proposals that fund Glenn College graduate or undergraduate students
- Proposals that generate preliminary data with the goal to pursue extramural funding
- Priority given to proposals that have a collaborative nature across campus or demonstrate a strong collaborative element when pursuing consequential extramural funding
Proposals that only identify the research activities that the faculty member will engage in but not a strategy for generating “primary outputs” will not be approved.
- One page summary written for the lay reader
- Three to five page project narrative which will have four sections:
- objective(s) (including attention for how the project fills a gap in knowledge and/or approach),
- methods (can be quantitative, qualitative),
- work plan, and
- expected impact on the College and future funding.
- Collaborative opportunities across campus (half page)
- Budget and budget narrative
- List of references cited
- Innovation: 15 points
- Method: 20 points
- Work plan: 15 points
- Expected impact on the college: 15 points
- Expected impact on proposing faculty’s future funding: 25 points
- Budget and budget justification: 10 points